Home > Hard Drive > Hitachi HDD Vs Seagate HDD

Hitachi HDD Vs Seagate HDD


I've been strictly a Seagate Hard Drive owner though and I can almost agree they fail regularly and usually right after warranty or close to end of warranty. Ross Lazarus There's a more complete description of my KM analysis of the raw data in case anyone cares at http://bioinformare.blogspot.com.au/2016/02/survival-analysis-of-hard-disk-drive.html . In the tables here, such years are not mentioned. More I think Intel should start with at lest double the maximum RAM capacity in typical workstation ie... http://lacosteradigital.com/hard-drive/seagate-portable-500gb-not-recognized.html

i have a few now that are over 4 years some running 24/7. They had zero hard drive failures in Q1 2016. David Moor "In fact we try to avoid enterprise drives whenever possible" This wording implies that there is something other than cost involved. Odd.

Hgst Hard Drive

Raymond Savoie Those 29,000+ Seagate 4TB drives (ST4000DM000) they are desktop-class drives and are not NAS certified by Seagate, unless I'm mistaken. Backblaze has only a limited number of Toshiba drives, and thus far they're performing at about the same level as the Seagates. I've been using WD Black in my home systems for many years without any problems.

donwJun 7, 2014, 5:49 PM WD is better bet i guess, i had all three brands. We agree. Fortunately, the mirror drive was fine, so I ditched the dead drive and rebuilt the array with another HGST. Most Reliable External Hard Drive 2016 I remember back in the mid 90s when 4GB, not 4TB drives were the norm there was a batch of bad bearings that made it into the supply chain.

In recommendation, Seagate would be the personally preferred. Most Reliable Hard Drive 2016 I think this points to HGST being the best, but their prices are too high according to them so they buy the higher failure rate drives. admindss Hmmmm Pretty Interesting statistics !!! https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-q4-2015/ It runs like crap and often resends terabytes of files it should already have to its cloud servers, tying up my internet for weeks.

The HGST drives are nice, but bang for the buck is what I look for. Seagate Vs Western Digital External Hard Drive Umar Azmat what about 1tb hard drive comparisons. I'm happy to help if anyone wants to adapt the method to provide better insight into the data? Stefan Sonnenberg-carstens The dimension is not percentage: it is 100-drive-failures per days in service.

Most Reliable Hard Drive 2016

Western Digital Hard Drives More resources See also solved Seagate Barracuda vs Western Digital Caviar Blue solved Seagate vs Western Digital - Which one? Check This Out Off to RMA it goes. Hgst Hard Drive However, I hate to say it, but it's not enough. Hgst External Hard Drive With this data noted, it's generally a good idea to burn-in test your components upon receipt to ensure long-term reliability, as we've written before.

As I understand it, you have chosen to have 2X servers fill up in 2Y days, instead of x servers in y days? I'm begging you. And in my experience Western Digital is usually cheaper than Seagate. do they start to have some bad sectors, have one or more SMART parameter beyond some threshold, or are the drives completely dead? Most Reliable Hard Drive Brand

While Backblaze is now offering general purpose cloud storage that's comparable to Amazon's S3 or Microsoft's Azure storage, its main application is still backups, and this focus strongly influences access patterns. They've lasted years for me & are rock solid. If Backblaze would bother purchasing some Seagate enterprise drives for a fair comparison, you would see rather similar results. How is this a fair depiction of consumer based product reliability?

What i found interesting was the smaller subset of ‘enterprise' class drives actually had a slightly higher failure rate than ‘consumer' drives, possibly due to error margin on a small subset Hgst Vs Wd Personally, I've been using WD a lot in recent years. For us as a small operation targeting enterprise grade availability it is a major nuisance to be replacing drives, so for me its HGST all the way.

I'd take huge issue with the fact that they don't ensure their replacement drives at all if that's the case.

HGST has the lowest failure rate again in 2014. By now, Backblaze would have a backup since it runs natively and rapidly on Macs and Windows. These days we need to purchase drives in reasonably large quantities, 5,000 to 10,000 at a time. Most Reliable Portable Hard Drive The short answer is that we’ve tried.

For example, by considering only the indicator for failure, some drive has 07-01 07-02 07-03 07-04 07-05 07-06 0 NA NA NA 0 1 Does these records are only the matter SSD - Solid State - Hard Drives - Who is the fastest - Most Reliable Can't find your answer ? The same principle is used in all manufacturing companies, the higher the specifications, the higher the qualifying and so goes the quality. I believe that was prior to Hitachi being able to fix whatever the problem was but after putting their label on the drive.

Aitor Bleda You are just trolling. They are made in China, lol http://climaterevolution.net/ Manu Sharma Most useful PC story I've read in a long time. The workload is dispersed over a large number of Storage Pods/Vaults so any given read or write is not impeded. What about using 6-, 8- and 10TB drives?

The trends here match what we've observed in previous quarters, and there aren't any significant changes to report to relative drive rankings. My experience and most people i know that deal with this stuff have experienced what i have. In other words, they have a higher MBTF and are built to handle running all the time. We actually didn't retire these 1TB WD drives - they just changed jobs.

Your second point is valid as we didn't include an obvious reference back to previous studies.